This paper presents the comparison results between two new generator configurations. These generator units are namely a field assisted switched reluctance generator (SRG) and a brushless dc (BLDC) generator. No permanent magnets are used in either unit. The field assisted SR generator consists of two magnetically dependent stator and rotor sets (layers), where each stator set includes twelve salient poles with windings wrapped around them, while the rotor comprises of eight salient poles without any winding or permanent magnet. There is a stationary reel, which has the field coil wrapped around it and is placed between the two-stator sets. The BLDC generator is also made up of two magnetically dependent stator and rotor sets, but each stator set includes nine salient poles with windings wrapped around them while, the rotor comprises of six salient poles without any windings or permanent magnets. There is also a stationary reel between the two layers to produce the magnetic field through the motor assembly. This magnetic field travels through a guide to the rotor then the stator and finally completes its path via the generator housing. The generator phase windings for each layer are connect such that all the stator poles in that set can have either north or south pole configuration while the stator poles in the other layer have the opposite pole arrangement. This type of connection can be used in motoring mode as well. To evaluate the performance of the generators, two types of analysis, namely, numerical technique and experimental study have been utilized. In the numerical analysis, three dimensional finite element analysis is employed, whereas in the experimental study, proto-types have been built and tested.
2. Lee, H., et al., "Practical control for improving power density and efficiency of the BLDC generator," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 192-199, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TPEL.2004.839805
3. Lee, H. W., T. H. Kim, and M. Ehsani, "Maximum power throughput in the multiphase brushless DC generator," IEE Proceedings Electric Power Applications, Vol. 152, No. 3, 501-508, 2005.
doi:10.1049/ip-epa:20045051
4. Kim, T., H. W. Lee, and M. Ehsani, "Position sensorless brushless DC motor/generator drives: Review and future trends," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 1, No. 4, 557-564, 2007.
doi:10.1049/iet-epa:20060358
5. Chen, H. C., T. Y. Tsai, and C. K. Huang, "Low-speed performance comparisons of back-EMF detection circuits with position-dependent load torque," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 3, No. 2, 160-169, 2009.
doi:10.1049/iet-epa:20080017
6. Zhang, Z., et al., "Development of a new permanent-magnet BLDC generator using 12-phase half-wave rectifier," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 56, No. 6, 2023-2029, 2009.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2009.2016511
7. Chen, H. and J. J. Gu, "Implementation of the three-phase switched reluctance machine system for motors and generators," IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 15, No. 3, 421-432, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TMECH.2009.2027901
8. Torkaman, H. and E. Afjei, "FEM analysis of angular misalignment fault in SRM magnetostatic characteristics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 104, 31-48, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10041406
9. Afjei, E., A. Seyadatan, and H. Torkaman, "A new two phase bidirectional hybrid switched reluctance motor/field-assisted generator," Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4, 765-770, 2009.
doi:10.3923/jas.2009.765.770
10. Ding, W. and D. Liang, "Dynamic modeling and control for a switched reluctance starter/generator system," International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, 3315-3320, 2008.
11. Ferreira, C. A., et al., "Detailed design of a 30-kW switched reluctance starter/generator system for a gas turbine engine application," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 31, No. 3, 553-561, 1995.
doi:10.1109/28.382116
12. Echenique, E., et al., "Sensorless control for a switched reluctance wind generator, based on current slopes and neural networks," IEEE Transaction on Industrial slopes and neural networks, Vol. 56, No. 3, 817-825, 2009.
13. Cardenas, R., et al., "Control of a switched reluctance generator for variable-speed wind energy applications," IEEE Transaction on Energy Conversion, Vol. 20, No. 4, 781-791, 2005.
doi:10.1109/TEC.2005.853733
14. Fahimi, B., A. Emadi, R. B. Sepe, and Jr., "A switched reluctance machine-based starter/alternator for more electric cars," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 19, No. 1, 116-124, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TEC.2003.822322
15. Afjei, E. and H. Torkaman, "The novel two phase field-assisted hybrid SRG: Magnetio static field analysis, simulation, and experimental confirmation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 18, 25-42, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIERB09082404
16. Hanselman, D. C., Brushless Permanent Magnet Motor Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994.
17. Afjei, E. and H. Toliyat, "A novel hybrid brushless dc motor/generator for hybrid vehicles applications," International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems, 1-6, 2006.
doi:10.1109/PEDES.2006.344366
18. Ravaud, R., G. Lemarquand, V. Lemarquand, and C. Depollier, "The three exact components of the magnetic field created by a radially magnetized tile permanent magnet," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 88, 307-319, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08112708
19. Ravaud, R., G. Lemarquand, V. Lemarquand, S. I. Babic, and C. Akyel, "Mutual inductance and force exerted between thick coils," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 102, 367-380, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10012806
20. Ravaud, R., G. Lemarquand, V. Lemarquand, S. Babic, and C. Akyel, "Mutual inductance and force exerted between thick coils," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 102, 367-380, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10012806
21. Torkaman, H. and E. Afjei, "Magnetio static field analysis regarding the effects of dynamic eccentricity in switched reluctance motor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 8, 163-180, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIERM09060205
22. Torkaman, H. and E. Afjei, "Hybrid method of obtaining degrees of freedom for radial airgap length in SRM under normal and faulty conditions based on magnetiostatic model," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 100, 37-54, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER09111108
23. Magnet CAD package, User Manual, Infolytica Corporation Ltd., 2007.
Submit
